Across Protocol vs Wormhole
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 105,407 | 379,051 |
| Categories | Bridges | Bridges |
| Description | The fastest and most secure intent-based bridge to Solana | The leading cross-chain messaging and bridge protocol |
Pros & Cons
Across Protocol
- Fastest Solana bridge with proven security track record across 17M+ transactions
- Developer-friendly SDK for embedding Solana bridge support in dApps
- Currently limited to USDC for Solana bridging with more assets planned
- Primarily EVM-focused with Solana as a newer addition to the network
Wormhole
- Widest chain coverage with 30+ supported networks
- Battle-tested infrastructure processing billions in cross-chain volume
Across Protocol vs Wormhole: Which Should You Choose?
Both Across Protocol and Wormhole are rated similarly by the community.
Pricing: Across Protocol is free while Wormhole is free.
Health & Reliability: Across Protocol has a healthy health status (100/100) while Wormhole is rated healthy (100/100).
Feature set: Across Protocol offers 4 features and Wormhole offers 8 features. Check their individual pages for detailed feature breakdowns and user reviews.