Goldsky vs Eclipse
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 11,482 | 241,781 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, Developer Tools | Bridges, Developer Tools |
| Description | Real-time blockchain data infrastructure with subgraph hosting and streaming pipelines | Ethereum L2 powered by the Solana Virtual Machine for high-throughput dApps |
Pros & Cons
Goldsky
- Eliminates need to build custom indexing infrastructure
- Real-time streaming reduces reliance on RPC polling
- Supports 140+ chains including Solana
- Free tier for getting started
- Developer-focused — not for end users
- Subgraph development has a learning curve
- Paid plans needed for production workloads
Goldsky vs Eclipse: Which Should You Choose?
Both Goldsky and Eclipse are rated similarly by the community.
Pricing: Goldsky is freemium while Eclipse is free. If budget is a concern, Eclipse might be the better pick.
Health & Reliability: Goldsky has a healthy health status (100/100) while Eclipse is rated healthy (97/100).
Feature set: Goldsky offers 5 features and Eclipse offers 5 features. Check their individual pages for detailed feature breakdowns and user reviews.