Orangefin vs Web3Auth
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,259 | 29,438 |
| Categories | Staking, Wallets | Developer Tools, Wallets |
| Description | Non-custodial Solana staking app with 0% commission and MEV rewards | Wallet-as-a-service SDK enabling social login authentication for Solana dApps |
Pros & Cons
Orangefin
- Highest-tier validator performance with ISO 27001 certification and 100% uptime
- First validator with a native Solana Mobile dApp Store staking app
- Limited to staking with Orangefin's own validator rather than offering validator choice
- Backed by a publicly traded company which may not appeal to all DeFi users
Web3Auth
- Dramatically reduces user onboarding friction
- Non-custodial despite social login UX
Orangefin vs Web3Auth: Which Should You Choose?
Both Orangefin and Web3Auth are rated similarly by the community.
Pricing: Orangefin is free while Web3Auth is freemium. If budget is a concern, Orangefin might be the better pick.
Health & Reliability: Orangefin has a healthy health status (100/100) while Web3Auth is rated healthy (93/100).
Feature set: Orangefin offers 4 features and Web3Auth offers 5 features. Check their individual pages for detailed feature breakdowns and user reviews.