OrangeRock vs Web3Auth
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 29 | 29,438 |
| Categories | Wallets, Exchanges | Developer Tools, Wallets |
| Description | Non-custodial mobile trading app with perpetuals and cross-chain swaps | Wallet-as-a-service SDK enabling social login authentication for Solana dApps |
Pros & Cons
OrangeRock
- Full self-custody with instant onboarding and zero identity requirements
- Backed by Bitcoin.com with Hyperliquid-grade perpetuals infrastructure
- Currently iOS-only with Android and desktop versions still in development
- Cross-chain swap costs vary by network and may not always be the cheapest
Web3Auth
- Dramatically reduces user onboarding friction
- Non-custodial despite social login UX
OrangeRock vs Web3Auth: Which Should You Choose?
Both OrangeRock and Web3Auth are rated similarly by the community.
Pricing: OrangeRock is free while Web3Auth is freemium. If budget is a concern, OrangeRock might be the better pick.
Health & Reliability: OrangeRock has a healthy health status (85/100) while Web3Auth is rated healthy (93/100).
Feature set: OrangeRock offers 4 features and Web3Auth offers 5 features. Check their individual pages for detailed feature breakdowns and user reviews.