Realms vs Sanctum
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 | ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 9,457 | 80,803 |
| Categories | Developer Tools | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | DAO governance platform for creating and managing Solana organizations | Liquid staking infrastructure unifying Solana LSTs |
Pros & Cons
Realms
- Standard governance platform for Solana — used by hundreds of DAOs including major protocols
- Built on SPL governance program with strong Solana foundation team involvement
- Extremely flexible — supports everything from small NFT community DAOs to billion-dollar protocols
- Fully on-chain governance with executable proposals — not just signaling votes
- Open-source with active community development and regular feature additions
- Interface can be complex and overwhelming for non-technical DAO participants
Realms vs Sanctum: Which Should You Choose?
Both Realms and Sanctum are rated similarly by the community.
Pricing: Realms is free while Sanctum is free.
Health & Reliability: Realms has a healthy health status (100/100) while Sanctum is rated healthy (100/100).
Feature set: Realms offers 8 features and Sanctum offers 7 features. Check their individual pages for detailed feature breakdowns and user reviews.