Web3Auth vs Eclipse
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 29,438 | 241,781 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Wallets | Bridges, Developer Tools |
| Description | Wallet-as-a-service SDK enabling social login authentication for Solana dApps | Ethereum L2 powered by the Solana Virtual Machine for high-throughput dApps |
Pros & Cons
Web3Auth
- Dramatically reduces user onboarding friction
- Non-custodial despite social login UX
- Multi-chain support including Solana
- Well-funded with strong adoption
- Adds dependency on Web3Auth infrastructure
- MPC key recovery has edge case complexity
- Free tier has usage limits
Web3Auth vs Eclipse: Which Should You Choose?
Both Web3Auth and Eclipse are rated similarly by the community.
Pricing: Web3Auth is freemium while Eclipse is free. If budget is a concern, Eclipse might be the better pick.
Health & Reliability: Web3Auth has a healthy health status (93/100) while Eclipse is rated healthy (97/100).
Feature set: Web3Auth offers 5 features and Eclipse offers 5 features. Check their individual pages for detailed feature breakdowns and user reviews.