Head-to-head · Liquid Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 11, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Layer33 Layer33 is a coalition of 25 independent Solana validators focused on network decentralization, with roughly 18M SOL of combined stake. Rather than a single operator, it organizes independent validato... Phase Labs Phase Labs is a Solana staking infrastructure provider that issues phaseSOL, a liquid staking token representing SOL delegated through its validator setup. The hook is staking that stays liquid, so th...
Phase Labs is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Layer33 (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Layer33 uses a free model, while Phase Labs is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Layer33 offers 5 features including Coalition of 25 independent Solana validators, IndieSOL composable liquid staking token, Standard staking rewards while keeping liquidity, and 2 more. Phase Labs counters with 5 features including phaseSOL liquid staking token, Non-custodial SOL staking, Enterprise-grade validator infrastructure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Layer33 currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Phase Labs is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Layer33's key strengths include actively supports solana validator decentralization, indiesol is usable across defi while earning, stake spread across many independent operators. Phase Labs stands out for keeps staked sol liquid via phasesol, non-custodial; keys stay with the user, hardened validator and multisig security. On the flip side, Layer33's weaknesses include indiesol is smaller and less liquid than leading lsts, while Phase Labs's main drawback is smaller lst with less liquidity than jito or marinade.
More comparisons
Compare Layer33 with…
Compare Phase Labs with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 103,905 | — |
| Categories | Staking, Liquid Staking | Liquid Staking |
| Description | Coalition of 25 independent Solana validators with IndieSOL liquid staking | Solana liquid staking provider offering phaseSOL LST with enterprise-grade validator infrastructure |
Both Layer33 and Phase Labs operate in the liquid staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Phase Labs has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Layer33 is free to start and Phase Labs is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.