![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 5,003 | 58,615 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | Developer Tools, DePIN |
| Description | High-performance Solana RPC nodes with up to 6,500 TPS on dedicated bare-metal servers | Decentralized GPU compute marketplace for AI inference on Solana |
Ligma Node Ligma Node is a Solana RPC node service providing fast, reliable blockchain access on dedicated bare-metal servers across the USA, EU, and Asia. Offers plans reaching up to 6,500 TPS with minimum late... Nosana Nosana is a decentralized GPU compute marketplace on Solana that connects AI developers who need GPU resources with node operators who have idle GPU capacity. The protocol focuses specifically on AI i...
Both Ligma Node and Nosana hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Ligma Node uses a paid model, while Nosana is paid — Pay-per-job GPU compute pricing. Rates vary by GPU type and job duration. Typically 50-80% cheaper than AWS/GCP inference. Payment in NOS tokens..
Ligma Node offers 5 features including Up to 6,500 TPS capacity, Dedicated bare-metal servers, Global coverage (USA, EU, Asia), and 2 more. Nosana counters with 8 features including Decentralized GPU marketplace matching AI workloads with available compute nodes, Focus on AI inference — optimized for running trained models in production, Support for consumer GPUs to enterprise A100/H100 data center hardware, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Ligma Node currently has a healthy health status. Nosana is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Ligma Node's key strengths include high tps capacity for demanding applications, dedicated hardware eliminates noisy-neighbor issues. Nosana stands out for significantly cheaper gpu compute compared to centralized cloud providers for inference, targets the largest segment of ai compute spending (inference = 80-90% of total), growing gpu supply from diverse node operators provides competitive pricing. On the flip side, Ligma Node's weaknesses include newer provider with smaller track record, while Nosana's main drawback is decentralized compute has inherent latency overhead compared to dedicated data center deployments.
While Ligma Node (RPC Providers) and Nosana (Developer Tools) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Ligma Node's pricing and check Nosana's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.