Manifest vs Hashflow
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 3,521 | 179,005 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps | DEXs & Swaps |
| Description | Open-source central limit order book (CLOB) for spot trading on Solana | RFQ-based DEX with zero slippage trading on Solana |
Pros & Cons
Manifest
- True order book trading — not AMM-based
- Open-source with developer-friendly APIs
- Lower liquidity than established AMM DEXs
- More complex than simple swap interfaces
Hashflow
- Zero slippage even on large trades
- Professional market maker pricing
- Cross-chain native support
- Integrated into Jupiter routing
- Requires market maker availability for quotes
- Less suitable for very small trades
- Fewer supported tokens than AMM DEXs
Manifest vs Hashflow: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
Manifest Manifest is a decentralized spot exchange with a fully on-chain central limit order book on Solana. Users can place limit orders through a REST API or TypeScript SDK. Open-source and maintained by Bon... Hashflow Hashflow is a decentralized exchange using a Request-for-Quote model that connects traders directly with professional market makers for zero-slippage execution. Live on Solana since 2025 and integrate...
Community Ratings
Both Manifest and Hashflow hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
Manifest uses a free model, while Hashflow is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Key Features
Manifest offers 4 features including Fully on-chain central limit order book, REST API for placing orders without direct blockchain interaction, TypeScript SDK for advanced on-chain integration, and 1 more. Hashflow counters with 6 features including Zero-slippage RFQ trading model, Cross-chain swaps across Solana and EVM chains, Integrated with Jupiter aggregator on Solana, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Manifest currently has a healthy health status. Hashflow is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Manifest's key strengths include true order book trading — not amm-based, open-source with developer-friendly apis. Hashflow stands out for zero slippage even on large trades, professional market maker pricing, cross-chain native support. On the flip side, Manifest's weaknesses include lower liquidity than established amm dexs, while Hashflow's main drawback is requires market maker availability for quotes.
The Verdict
Both Manifest and Hashflow operate in the dexs & swaps space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Manifest is free to start and Hashflow is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.