ProxyGate vs Sanctum
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 | ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 44 | 81,522 |
| Categories | API Platforms, AI Agents | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | API marketplace for AI agents — buy and sell APIs with USDC on Solana | Liquid staking infrastructure unifying Solana LSTs |
Pros & Cons
ProxyGate
- Solana-native with on-chain USDC payments
- Purpose-built for the AI agent ecosystem
- Smaller marketplace compared to RapidAPI
- Requires USDC on Solana for transactions
Sanctum
- Solves LST liquidity fragmentation with unified Infinity pool
- Enables any validator to create their own LST — democratizes liquid staking
- INF token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual LSTs
- Zero-slippage LST swaps improve capital efficiency for DeFi strategies
- Growing ecosystem of validator LSTs creates unique staking opportunities
- Smart contract risk across the multi-LST pool infrastructure
- Newer protocol with less battle-testing than established LST providers
ProxyGate vs Sanctum: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
ProxyGate ProxyGate is a Solana-native API marketplace where developers and AI agents can buy and sell APIs, tunnels, skills, datasets, and services using USDC. Built specifically for the agentic economy with C... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Community Ratings
Both ProxyGate and Sanctum hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
ProxyGate uses a freemium model, while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Sanctum has the edge for budget-conscious users, though ProxyGate's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Key Features
ProxyGate offers 4 features including Buy and sell APIs with USDC on Solana, Built for AI agent consumption, CLI tool for developers (@proxygate/cli), and 1 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. ProxyGate currently has a healthy health status. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
ProxyGate's key strengths include solana-native with on-chain usdc payments, purpose-built for the ai agent ecosystem. Sanctum stands out for solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts. On the flip side, ProxyGate's weaknesses include smaller marketplace compared to rapidapi, while Sanctum's main drawback is smart contract risk across the multi-lst pool infrastructure.
The Verdict
While ProxyGate (API Platforms) and Sanctum (DeFi & Yield) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — ProxyGate is free to start and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.