Salmon vs Unruggable
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Unknown | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 7,412 | 6,520 |
| Categories | Wallets | Wallets, Security & Audit |
| Description | Open-source community Solana wallet with transaction simulation | First hardware wallet built specifically for Solana with MPC key security |
Pros & Cons
Salmon
- Fully open-source
- Transaction simulation prevents mistakes
- Community-governed
- Free to use
- Smaller user base than Phantom or Backpack
- Less active development recently
Unruggable
- Purpose-built for Solana ecosystem
- Won Solana Cypherpunk Hackathon grand prize
- Requires physical hardware purchase
- Pre-order stage
Salmon vs Unruggable: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
Salmon Salmon is an open-source, community-owned Solana wallet browser extension built with transparency and security in mind. It features transaction simulation to preview outcomes before signing, full SPL... Unruggable Unruggable is the first hardware wallet designed exclusively for Solana using MPC instead of seed phrases. It splits key shares across devices and natively integrates Jupiter swaps, Jito MEV protectio...
Community Ratings
Both Salmon and Unruggable hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
Salmon uses a free model, while Unruggable is paid. Salmon has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Unruggable's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Key Features
Salmon offers 5 features including Transaction simulation, Open-source codebase, SPL token support, and 2 more. Unruggable counters with 5 features including Solana-native hardware wallet, MPC security (no seed phrase), Native Jupiter and Jito integration, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Salmon currently has a unknown health status. Unruggable is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Salmon's key strengths include fully open-source, transaction simulation prevents mistakes, community-governed. Unruggable stands out for purpose-built for solana ecosystem, won solana cypherpunk hackathon grand prize. On the flip side, Salmon's weaknesses include smaller user base than phantom or backpack, while Unruggable's main drawback is requires physical hardware purchase.
The Verdict
Both Salmon and Unruggable operate in the wallets space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Salmon is free to start and check Unruggable's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.