Last updated: April 3, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 81,650 | 39,558 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity | Unified liquidity layer powering Jupiter Lend with $1.65B TVL on Solana |
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... Fluid Fluid is a unified liquidity protocol by Instadapp that combines lending and DEX trading into a single layer on Solana. As the engine powering Jupiter Lend, Fluid has amassed over $1.65 billion in tot...
Both Sanctum and Fluid hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while Fluid is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. Fluid counters with 6 features including Unified lending and DEX liquidity layer, Powers Jupiter Lend on Solana, Over $1.65B in total value locked, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Fluid is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sanctum's key strengths include solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts. Fluid stands out for massive tvl demonstrates deep liquidity, jupiter integration provides broad ecosystem reach, capital-efficient design maximizes yield on deposits. On the flip side, Sanctum's weaknesses include smart contract risk across the multi-lst pool infrastructure, while Fluid's main drawback is complex mechanics may confuse new defi users.
Both Sanctum and Fluid operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Sanctum is free to start and Fluid is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.