Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... Zeta Markets Zeta Markets is a decentralized derivatives exchange on Solana offering perpetual futures and options trading with on-chain order books. It provides advanced trading tools for derivatives traders who...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.7/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 4.5/5 for Zeta Markets (2 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while Zeta Markets is free — No platform fee. Trading fees: maker -0.01% (rebate), taker 0.05%. Fees reduced at higher volume tiers.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. Zeta Markets counters with 8 features including On-chain central limit order book for perpetual futures, Cross-margin system for portfolio-level capital efficiency, Limit orders, stop-losses, and take-profit at protocol level, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Zeta Markets is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sanctum's key strengths include solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts.
More comparisons
Compare Sanctum with…
Compare Zeta Markets with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | 81,071 | 3,382 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | DeFi & Yield, Perp DEXs |
| Description | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity | Decentralized perpetual futures exchange on Solana |
Both Sanctum and Zeta Markets operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Sanctum is free to start and Zeta Markets is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.