Solana Agent Kit MCP vs LiteSVM
Last updated: April 7, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Unknown | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 48,424 | — |
| Categories | MCP Servers, AI Agents, Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| Description | MCP server powered by Solana Agent Kit for on-chain actions | Fast and lightweight in-process Solana VM for testing programs without a validator |
Pros & Cons
Solana Agent Kit MCP
- Most actions of any Solana MCP
- Open source
- Works with any LLM
- Requires Solana private key
- Complex setup
LiteSVM
- Dramatically faster test execution
- Multi-language support (Rust, TS, Python)
- No external processes to manage
- Recommended by Anchor framework
- Cannot test validator-level behaviors
- Not suitable for integration testing with live state
- Requires complementary tools like Surfpool for full testing
Solana Agent Kit MCP vs LiteSVM: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
Solana Agent Kit MCP Model Context Protocol server powered by Solana Agent Kit that enables AI agents to perform 60+ on-chain Solana actions. Supports token deployment, NFT creation via Metaplex, DeFi operations on Jupite... LiteSVM LiteSVM is a high-performance testing library that creates an in-process Solana VM optimized for program developers, eliminating the need to start a separate validator. Available in Rust, TypeScript/J...
Community Ratings
Both Solana Agent Kit MCP and LiteSVM hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
Solana Agent Kit MCP uses a free model, while LiteSVM is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Key Features
Solana Agent Kit MCP offers 6 features including 60+ Solana actions, Token deployment, NFT minting, and 3 more. LiteSVM counters with 7 features including In-process Solana VM with no external validator needed, Available in Rust, TypeScript, and Python, Significantly faster than solana-test-validator, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Solana Agent Kit MCP currently has a unknown health status. LiteSVM is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Solana Agent Kit MCP's key strengths include most actions of any solana mcp, open source, works with any llm. LiteSVM stands out for dramatically faster test execution, multi-language support (rust, ts, python), no external processes to manage. On the flip side, Solana Agent Kit MCP's weaknesses include requires solana private key, while LiteSVM's main drawback is cannot test validator-level behaviors.
The Verdict
Both Solana Agent Kit MCP and LiteSVM operate in the developer tools space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Solana Agent Kit MCP is free to start and LiteSVM is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.