Solscan vs Axiom
Last updated: April 3, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 | ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 57,126 | 77,190 |
| Categories | Analytics & Charts | Trading Bots |
| Description | Free Solana block explorer — look up any transaction, wallet, token, or program with detailed analytics and holder data | Y Combinator-backed all-in-one Solana trading terminal with non-custodial wallets, wallet tracking, and tiered cashback fees. |
Pros & Cons
Solscan
- Most comprehensive and reliable Solana block explorer
- Default transaction verification tool linked by wallets and dApps
- Labeled accounts make it easy to identify known entities on-chain
- Pro API provides structured data access for developers
- Fast loading and responsive interface even during high network activity
- Pro API requires paid subscription for higher rate limits
- Advanced analytics features are less deep than specialized platforms like Birdeye
- Mobile experience could be more optimized for smaller screens
- Historical data queries can be slow for very active accounts
Axiom
- Among the fastest trading terminals on Solana for execution speed
- Comprehensive feature set rivaling the best web terminals and Telegram bots
Solscan vs Axiom: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
Solscan Solscan is the most widely used blockchain explorer for Solana, providing comprehensive tools for inspecting transactions, accounts, tokens, and on-chain programs. It serves as the default reference p... Axiom Axiom is an ultra-fast Solana trading terminal designed for professional and semi-professional traders who demand the lowest possible latency and the most advanced execution features. It has quickly g...
Community Ratings
Axiom is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Solscan (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Pricing & Value
Solscan uses a freemium model — Free explorer with basic analytics. Pro plans start at $39/month for advanced features and API access., while Axiom is freemium — Free to use. 1% base trading fee with tiered SOL cashback: Explorer (0.9%), Hunter (0.8%), Trader (0.7%), Champion (0.6%). Referral codes give 10-20% additional discount.. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Key Features
Solscan offers 8 features including Comprehensive transaction inspection with instruction-level detail, Token analytics with supply, holders, transfer history, and metadata, Account explorer showing balances, tokens, staking, and DeFi positions, and 5 more. Axiom counters with 8 features including Ultra-low latency trading execution optimized for Solana, Real-time token scanning and new launch detection, Advanced charting with multiple timeframes and technical indicators, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Solscan currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Axiom is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Solscan's key strengths include most comprehensive and reliable solana block explorer, default transaction verification tool linked by wallets and dapps, labeled accounts make it easy to identify known entities on-chain. Axiom stands out for among the fastest trading terminals on solana for execution speed, comprehensive feature set rivaling the best web terminals and telegram bots, professional-grade tools suitable for serious active traders. On the flip side, Solscan's weaknesses include pro api requires paid subscription for higher rate limits, while Axiom's main drawback is complex interface has a steeper learning curve for beginners.