8. Low-friction onboarding for the case a human still sets it up
Even fully-autonomous agents are usually configured by a human once. A free tier with no card requirement removes the biggest drop-off point in that setup — MadeOnSol's free tier is 200 calls/day, enough to actually evaluate the API before anyone commits to anything.
The honest part: auditing your own coverage will find gaps
Having all eight items above doesn't mean every endpoint is reachable from every surface. Building this checklist, we ran our own coverage audit — comparing every REST endpoint against what's actually callable from the MCP server, the ElizaOS plugin, the Solana Agent Kit plugin, and the x402 SDK — and found two categories of real gaps in our own API, not just a hypothetical:
- One endpoint (ranking a token's top traders by realized PnL) existed on the REST API but had no MCP/ElizaOS/Agent-Kit tool wired to it at all — a genuine miss, since the discovery text even mentioned it.
- Our sniper-detection feature (pre-confirmation deploy alerts) existed on the MCP server but was completely absent from the ElizaOS and Solana Agent Kit plugins — reachable from one agent framework and invisible to two others.
Both are fixed as of this post (2026-09-10) — the honest reason for mentioning it is that "agent-ready" isn't a one-time checkbox. New endpoints ship faster than SDK coverage does unless you build the audit into your release process, not just your initial launch.
FAQ
What does "agent-ready" actually mean for an API?
Machine-readable discovery (llms.txt + agents.json), an MCP server on a current spec, native plugins for the agent frameworks your buyers actually use (not just MCP), a keyless payment option like x402 for fully-autonomous agents, rate limits that return Retry-After and are queryable in advance, a real OpenAPI spec, structured errors with a code, and a low-friction free tier.
Why do AI agents fail against APIs that "have good documentation"?
Documentation written for humans (prose, examples, FAQs) doesn't help an agent branch on a rate-limit response or discover available tools without a human reading the page first. 2026 agent-pilot failure analysis points to undocumented rate limits and ambiguous error messages as the leading cause — both fixable independent of how good the prose docs are.
Is MCP enough, or do I need agent-framework plugins too?
MCP covers MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Claude Code). It does not cover agents built with a framework like ElizaOS or Solana Agent Kit, which expect a native plugin with typed actions. If your users build autonomous agents on those frameworks, MCP alone leaves that audience unreached.
What's the difference between an API key and x402 for agent access?
An API key requires a human to sign up once and provision it into the agent's config — normal for most deployments. x402 lets an agent with its own funded wallet pay per call with no signup at all, which matters specifically for agents provisioning themselves at runtime with no human in the loop.
How do I check if my own API's SDK coverage has gaps?
Enumerate every REST endpoint from your OpenAPI spec, then grep each of your SDK/plugin source files for the actual path strings they call (not just method names — a stale doc comment can claim coverage a method doesn't have). Diff the two lists. It's mechanical work, but doing it once surfaces exactly the kind of silent gap described above.
Try it
MadeOnSol's full agent-tooling surface — MCP, ElizaOS, Solana Agent Kit, x402 — is documented at /mcp and machine-readable at /agents.json. A free key runs any of it at 200 calls/day: madeonsol.com/pricing.