Across Protocol vs deBridge
Last updated: April 3, 2026
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 105,582 | 43,465 |
| Categories | Bridges | Bridges |
| Description | The fastest and most secure intent-based bridge to Solana | Cross-chain bridge with native asset transfers — move tokens between Solana, Ethereum, BNB Chain, and more with zero-TVL security |
Pros & Cons
Across Protocol
- Fastest Solana bridge with proven security track record across 17M+ transactions
- Developer-friendly SDK for embedding Solana bridge support in dApps
- Currently limited to USDC for Solana bridging with more assets planned
- Primarily EVM-focused with Solana as a newer addition to the network
deBridge
- Zero-TVL model dramatically reduces security risk compared to traditional bridges
- Fastest cross-chain settlement speeds in the industry
- Lower risk profile makes it attractive after major bridge exploits industry-wide
- Cross-chain limit orders offer advanced trading capabilities
- Growing chain support with regular additions to supported networks
- Smaller brand recognition compared to Wormhole or other established bridges
- Liquidity for some token pairs may be limited compared to larger bridges
Across Protocol vs deBridge: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
Across Protocol Across Protocol is a leading cross-chain bridge that enables fast, cheap, and secure asset transfers between Solana and EVM chains like Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism. Using an intent-based ar... deBridge deBridge is a cross-chain interoperability protocol that enables fast, capital-efficient transfers between Solana and other major blockchains. Unlike traditional bridge protocols that lock-and-mint wr...
Community Ratings
Both Across Protocol and deBridge hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
Across Protocol uses a free model, while deBridge is free — Free to use. Small bridge fee (typically 0-0.1%) plus destination chain gas. Referral program earns 25% of points.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Key Features
Across Protocol offers 4 features including Intent-based bridging with ~5-second Solana transfer finality, Zero security exploits across $27B+ in lifetime volume, Embedded cross-chain actions for direct Solana DeFi deposits, and 1 more. deBridge counters with 8 features including Zero-TVL bridge architecture with no large locked token pools, DLN (Liquidity Network) for near-instant cross-chain settlement, Cross-chain limit orders for executing transfers at target rates, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Across Protocol currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. deBridge is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Across Protocol's key strengths include fastest solana bridge with proven security track record across 17m+ transactions, developer-friendly sdk for embedding solana bridge support in dapps. deBridge stands out for zero-tvl model dramatically reduces security risk compared to traditional bridges, fastest cross-chain settlement speeds in the industry, lower risk profile makes it attractive after major bridge exploits industry-wide. On the flip side, Across Protocol's weaknesses include currently limited to usdc for solana bridging with more assets planned, while deBridge's main drawback is smaller brand recognition compared to wormhole or other established bridges.