Last updated: April 3, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | 43,465 | 24,141 |
| Categories | Bridges | RPC Providers |
| Description | Cross-chain bridge with native asset transfers — move tokens between Solana, Ethereum, BNB Chain, and more with zero-TVL security | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics |
deBridge deBridge is a cross-chain interoperability protocol that enables fast, capital-efficient transfers between Solana and other major blockchains. Unlike traditional bridge protocols that lock-and-mint wr... GetBlock GetBlock offers Solana RPC access through both shared and dedicated node plans. With 130+ blockchain networks supported, it provides a simple API dashboard, request analytics, and flexible pricing tha...
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for deBridge (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
deBridge uses a free model — Free to use. Small bridge fee (typically 0-0.1%) plus destination chain gas. Referral program earns 25% of points., while GetBlock is freemium. deBridge has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though GetBlock's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
deBridge offers 8 features including Zero-TVL bridge architecture with no large locked token pools, DLN (Liquidity Network) for near-instant cross-chain settlement, Cross-chain limit orders for executing transfers at target rates, and 5 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Shared and dedicated Solana nodes, 130+ blockchain networks, Request analytics dashboard, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. deBridge currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
deBridge's key strengths include zero-tvl model dramatically reduces security risk compared to traditional bridges, fastest cross-chain settlement speeds in the industry, lower risk profile makes it attractive after major bridge exploits industry-wide. GetBlock stands out for generous free tier for testing, multi-chain support from one provider, simple setup and api key management. On the flip side, deBridge's weaknesses include smaller brand recognition compared to wormhole or other established bridges, while GetBlock's main drawback is shared nodes have variable latency.
While deBridge (Bridges) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. We recommend trying both — deBridge is free to start and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.