InfStones vs Ligma Node
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 62,376 | 5,003 |
| Categories | RPC Providers, Staking | RPC Providers |
| Description | Enterprise blockchain infrastructure — node management and staking across 80+ chains | High-performance Solana RPC nodes with up to 6,500 TPS on dedicated bare-metal servers |
Pros & Cons
InfStones
- Enterprise-grade reliability
- Massive multi-chain coverage
- Zero slashing track record
- Enterprise pricing
- Not for individual users
Ligma Node
- High TPS capacity for demanding applications
- Dedicated hardware eliminates noisy-neighbor issues
- Newer provider with smaller track record
- No free tier available
InfStones vs Ligma Node: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
InfStones InfStones is an enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure provider managing 20,000+ nodes across 80+ protocols including Solana. Offers dedicated RPC endpoints, validator staking services, and APIs f... Ligma Node Ligma Node is a Solana RPC node service providing fast, reliable blockchain access on dedicated bare-metal servers across the USA, EU, and Asia. Offers plans reaching up to 6,500 TPS with minimum late...
Community Ratings
Both InfStones and Ligma Node hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
InfStones uses a paid model, while Ligma Node is paid.
Key Features
InfStones offers 6 features including 20,000+ nodes managed globally, 80+ blockchain protocols, Dedicated Solana RPC, and 3 more. Ligma Node counters with 5 features including Up to 6,500 TPS capacity, Dedicated bare-metal servers, Global coverage (USA, EU, Asia), and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. InfStones currently has a healthy health status. Ligma Node is rated healthy. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
InfStones's key strengths include enterprise-grade reliability, massive multi-chain coverage, zero slashing track record. Ligma Node stands out for high tps capacity for demanding applications, dedicated hardware eliminates noisy-neighbor issues. On the flip side, InfStones's weaknesses include enterprise pricing, while Ligma Node's main drawback is newer provider with smaller track record.
The Verdict
Both InfStones and Ligma Node operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check InfStones's pricing and check Ligma Node's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.