Lighthouse Protocol vs TokenSpy
Last updated: April 14, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Unknown | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 4 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 1,095 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Solana transaction assertion protocol preventing wallet drain attacks | Chrome extension that scans Solana tokens for rug pulls and scams |
Pros & Cons
Lighthouse Protocol
- Free and open-source
- Direct Phantom integration
- Addresses real attack vectors
- Requires developer adoption to be effective
- No centralized support team
TokenSpy
- Works passively while you browse — no extra steps needed
- Free with no wallet connection required
- Data may occasionally be inaccurate for very new tokens
- Chrome-only — no Firefox or Safari support
Lighthouse Protocol vs TokenSpy: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
Lighthouse Protocol Lighthouse Protocol is an open-source Solana program that adds assertion instructions to transactions, preventing wallet draining attacks and simulation spoofing. Developers and wallets can use Lighth... TokenSpy TokenSpy is a browser extension that analyzes Solana tokens for rug pull risks directly on DexScreener and DexTools. It provides a risk score out of 99, checks mint authority, buy/sell tax changes, to...
Community Ratings
Both Lighthouse Protocol and TokenSpy hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
Lighthouse Protocol uses a free model, while TokenSpy is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Key Features
Lighthouse Protocol offers 5 features including Transaction assertion guards, Wallet drain prevention, TOCTOU attack protection, and 2 more. TokenSpy counters with 4 features including Risk score out of 99 for any Solana token, Integrates directly into DexScreener and DexTools, Checks mint authority, taxes, holder concentration, liquidity locks, and 1 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Lighthouse Protocol currently has a unknown health status. TokenSpy is rated healthy. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Lighthouse Protocol's key strengths include free and open-source, direct phantom integration, addresses real attack vectors. TokenSpy stands out for works passively while you browse — no extra steps needed, free with no wallet connection required. On the flip side, Lighthouse Protocol's weaknesses include requires developer adoption to be effective, while TokenSpy's main drawback is data may occasionally be inaccurate for very new tokens.
The Verdict
Both Lighthouse Protocol and TokenSpy operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Lighthouse Protocol is free to start and TokenSpy is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.