Save (fka Solend) vs OtterSec
Last updated: April 3, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 84,221 | 20,770 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield | Security & Audit |
| Description | Decentralized lending and borrowing protocol — formerly Solend | Premier Solana smart contract security auditor trusted by top protocols |
Pros & Cons
Save (fka Solend)
- One of the longest-running Solana lending protocols — battle-tested through multiple market cycles
- Wide asset support including liquid staking tokens enables diverse lending strategies
- Strong risk management track record — survived major market crashes without protocol insolvency
- Deep liquidity in main pools ensures competitive rates for both depositors and borrowers
- Fully decentralized governance through SAVE token and DAO
- Controversial governance incident in 2022 (attempted whale account takeover) damaged trust
- Rebrand from Solend to Save created some confusion and fragmented brand recognition
- Interest rates can spike dramatically during high-utilization periods making borrowing expensive
- Competition from newer protocols like Marginfi and Kamino has reduced market share
OtterSec
- Gold-standard reputation — audit by OtterSec signals serious security commitment
Save (fka Solend) vs OtterSec: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
Save (fka Solend) Save, formerly known as Solend, is one of the original and largest decentralized lending and borrowing protocols on Solana. Rebranded from Solend in late 2024, Save allows users to deposit crypto asse... OtterSec OtterSec is one of the most respected security auditing firms in the Solana ecosystem, having audited critical infrastructure including Wormhole, Solana Program Library, Marinade, and dozens of top De...
Community Ratings
Both Save (fka Solend) and OtterSec hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
Save (fka Solend) uses a free model — Free to use. Interest rates are algorithmically determined by supply and demand. Small protocol fee on interest earned by depositors., while OtterSec is paid. Save (fka Solend) has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though OtterSec's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Key Features
Save (fka Solend) offers 8 features including Algorithmic lending and borrowing with dynamic interest rates based on utilization, Multi-pool architecture — main pool for blue-chips, isolated pools for newer assets, Real-time oracle pricing with dynamic liquidation thresholds for risk management, and 5 more. OtterSec counters with 5 features including Comprehensive Solana smart contract and program audits, Deep expertise in Rust, Anchor, and native Solana programs, Post-audit monitoring and incident response support, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Save (fka Solend) currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. OtterSec is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Save (fka Solend)'s key strengths include one of the longest-running solana lending protocols — battle-tested through multiple market cycles, wide asset support including liquid staking tokens enables diverse lending strategies, strong risk management track record — survived major market crashes without protocol insolvency. OtterSec stands out for gold-standard reputation — audit by ottersec signals serious security commitment, deepest solana-specific expertise of any audit firm, track record includes the most critical solana infrastructure. On the flip side, Save (fka Solend)'s weaknesses include controversial governance incident in 2022 (attempted whale account takeover) damaged trust, while OtterSec's main drawback is high demand means long wait times for audit slots.