Save (fka Solend) vs RugCheck
Last updated: April 3, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 84,221 | 41,728 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield | Security & Audit |
| Description | Decentralized lending and borrowing protocol — formerly Solend | Free Solana token scanner — check any contract for rug pull risks, mint authority, freeze authority & holder concentration in seconds |
Pros & Cons
Save (fka Solend)
- One of the longest-running Solana lending protocols — battle-tested through multiple market cycles
- Wide asset support including liquid staking tokens enables diverse lending strategies
- Strong risk management track record — survived major market crashes without protocol insolvency
- Deep liquidity in main pools ensures competitive rates for both depositors and borrowers
- Fully decentralized governance through SAVE token and DAO
- Controversial governance incident in 2022 (attempted whale account takeover) damaged trust
- Rebrand from Solend to Save created some confusion and fragmented brand recognition
- Interest rates can spike dramatically during high-utilization periods making borrowing expensive
- Competition from newer protocols like Marginfi and Kamino has reduced market share
RugCheck
- Completely free and essential tool for Solana token due diligence
Save (fka Solend) vs RugCheck: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
Save (fka Solend) Save, formerly known as Solend, is one of the original and largest decentralized lending and borrowing protocols on Solana. Rebranded from Solend in late 2024, Save allows users to deposit crypto asse... RugCheck RugCheck is an essential security tool for Solana traders that analyzes token contracts to identify potential risks, scam indicators, and red flags before trading. In an ecosystem where thousands of n...
Community Ratings
Both Save (fka Solend) and RugCheck hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
Save (fka Solend) uses a free model — Free to use. Interest rates are algorithmically determined by supply and demand. Small protocol fee on interest earned by depositors., while RugCheck is free — Free to use. API available for developers and integrators.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Key Features
Save (fka Solend) offers 8 features including Algorithmic lending and borrowing with dynamic interest rates based on utilization, Multi-pool architecture — main pool for blue-chips, isolated pools for newer assets, Real-time oracle pricing with dynamic liquidation thresholds for risk management, and 5 more. RugCheck counters with 8 features including Automated token contract analysis for common exploit vectors, Mint authority and freeze authority detection, Top holder concentration analysis to identify whale-controlled tokens, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Save (fka Solend) currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RugCheck is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Save (fka Solend)'s key strengths include one of the longest-running solana lending protocols — battle-tested through multiple market cycles, wide asset support including liquid staking tokens enables diverse lending strategies, strong risk management track record — survived major market crashes without protocol insolvency. RugCheck stands out for completely free and essential tool for solana token due diligence, quick visual risk scores make safety assessment instant, detailed explanations educate users about specific risk factors. On the flip side, Save (fka Solend)'s weaknesses include controversial governance incident in 2022 (attempted whale account takeover) damaged trust, while RugCheck's main drawback is cannot detect all scam types — social engineering and slow rugs may pass.