ARC (rig) vs Firedancer
Last updated: April 7, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 214,592 | 35,005 |
| Categories | AI Agents | Developer Tools |
| Description | Rust-native AI agent framework for Solana | Independent Solana validator client by Jump Crypto — 1M+ TPS capable |
Pros & Cons
ARC (rig)
- Rust performance and safety guarantees
- Low-level control over agent behavior
- Excellent for production Solana agents
- Growing ecosystem of plugins
- Rust expertise required
- Smaller community than JS/TS alternatives
- Steeper learning curve
Firedancer
- Critical for Solana's client diversity
- Best-in-class performance (1M+ TPS)
- Backed by Jump Crypto's resources
- Fully open-source and auditable
- Still maturing compared to Agave client
- Requires technical expertise to operate
ARC (rig) vs Firedancer: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
ARC (rig) ARC, built on the rig framework, is a Rust-native AI agent library optimized for performance and safety. It provides low-level building blocks for constructing AI agents that interact with Solana prog... Firedancer Firedancer is an independent Solana validator client built from scratch in C by Jump Crypto. Capable of processing over 1 million transactions per second on commodity hardware, Firedancer represents o...
Community Ratings
Both ARC (rig) and Firedancer hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
ARC (rig) uses a free model, while Firedancer is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Key Features
ARC (rig) offers 6 features including Rust-native agent framework, Type-safe agent construction, High-performance async runtime, and 3 more. Firedancer counters with 5 features including Independent Solana validator client in C, 1M+ TPS on commodity hardware, Live on mainnet with 50,000+ blocks produced, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. ARC (rig) currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Firedancer is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
ARC (rig)'s key strengths include rust performance and safety guarantees, low-level control over agent behavior, excellent for production solana agents. Firedancer stands out for critical for solana's client diversity, best-in-class performance (1m+ tps), backed by jump crypto's resources. On the flip side, ARC (rig)'s weaknesses include rust expertise required, while Firedancer's main drawback is still maturing compared to agave client.
The Verdict
While ARC (rig) (AI Agents) and Firedancer (Developer Tools) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — ARC (rig) is free to start and Firedancer is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.