Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 4, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 9 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Pulsar Finance Pulsar Finance is a comprehensive multi-chain portfolio tracker that aggregates wallet holdings, DeFi positions, and yield across Solana and other chains. Automatically detects staking, lending, and L... RPC Fast RPC Fast provides dedicated Solana RPC endpoints optimized for low latency and high throughput. Built specifically for trading bots and applications that need fast transaction submission, it offers ba...
Pulsar Finance is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for RPC Fast (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Pulsar Finance uses a free model, while RPC Fast is paid. Pulsar Finance has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though RPC Fast's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Pulsar Finance offers 5 features including Auto-detect DeFi positions across 200+ protocols, Multi-chain portfolio aggregation, Real-time PnL and yield tracking, and 2 more. RPC Fast counters with 9 features including Low-latency dedicated RPC nodes, High-performance bare-metal infrastructure, Yellowstone gRPC, and 6 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Pulsar Finance currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RPC Fast is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Pulsar Finance's key strengths include deep solana defi protocol integration, free comprehensive portfolio tracking, clean interface with multi-wallet support. RPC Fast stands out for optimized for speed-sensitive applications, dedicated resources (not shared), good uptime track record. On the flip side, Pulsar Finance's weaknesses include some newer protocols may not be tracked immediately, while RPC Fast's main drawback is no free tier.
More comparisons
Compare Pulsar Finance with…
Compare RPC Fast with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 12,308 | 439 |
| Categories | Portfolio Trackers | RPC Providers |
| Description | Multi-chain portfolio tracker with DeFi position tracking across Solana protocols | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. |
While Pulsar Finance (Portfolio Trackers) and RPC Fast (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Pulsar Finance has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Pulsar Finance is free to start and check RPC Fast's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.