Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 8, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 9 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
RPC Fast RPC Fast provides dedicated Solana RPC endpoints optimized for low latency and high throughput. Built specifically for trading bots and applications that need fast transaction submission, it offers ba... Bloom Bloom is an AI-powered Solana trading bot that uses machine learning to assist traders with token analysis, trade execution, and portfolio management. It represents the newer generation of trading too...
RPC Fast is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Bloom (2 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
RPC Fast uses a paid model — https://rpcfast.com/pricing, while Bloom is freemium.
RPC Fast offers 9 features including Low-latency dedicated RPC nodes, High-performance bare-metal infrastructure, Yellowstone gRPC, and 6 more. Bloom counters with 8 features including AI-powered token analysis with risk assessment and sentiment detection, Telegram-based trading with quick swap execution, Machine learning-assisted trade recommendations, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RPC Fast currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Bloom is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
RPC Fast's key strengths include optimized for speed-sensitive applications, dedicated resources (not shared), good uptime track record. Bloom stands out for ai analytics provide additional insight layer beyond basic trading features, comprehensive token analysis combines on-chain, social, and technical data, growing ai capabilities may improve over time as model training advances. On the flip side, RPC Fast's weaknesses include no free tier, while Bloom's main drawback is 1% transaction fee is among the highest for solana trading bots.
More comparisons
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 3 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | 446 | 24,801 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | Trading Bots |
| Description | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. | AI-powered Solana trading bot with smart execution |
While RPC Fast (RPC Providers) and Bloom (Trading Bots) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. RPC Fast has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check RPC Fast's pricing and Bloom is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.