Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 5, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 9 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
RPC Fast RPC Fast provides dedicated Solana RPC endpoints optimized for low latency and high throughput. Built specifically for trading bots and applications that need fast transaction submission, it offers ba... Pulsar Finance Pulsar Finance is a comprehensive multi-chain portfolio tracker that aggregates wallet holdings, DeFi positions, and yield across Solana and other chains. Automatically detects staking, lending, and L...
Pulsar Finance is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for RPC Fast (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
RPC Fast uses a paid model, while Pulsar Finance is free. Pulsar Finance has the edge for budget-conscious users, though RPC Fast's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
RPC Fast offers 9 features including Low-latency dedicated RPC nodes, High-performance bare-metal infrastructure, Yellowstone gRPC, and 6 more. Pulsar Finance counters with 5 features including Auto-detect DeFi positions across 200+ protocols, Multi-chain portfolio aggregation, Real-time PnL and yield tracking, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RPC Fast currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Pulsar Finance is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
RPC Fast's key strengths include optimized for speed-sensitive applications, dedicated resources (not shared), good uptime track record. Pulsar Finance stands out for deep solana defi protocol integration, free comprehensive portfolio tracking, clean interface with multi-wallet support. On the flip side, RPC Fast's weaknesses include no free tier, while Pulsar Finance's main drawback is some newer protocols may not be tracked immediately.
More comparisons
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 439 | 12,308 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | Portfolio Trackers |
| Description | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. | Multi-chain portfolio tracker with DeFi position tracking across Solana protocols |
While RPC Fast (RPC Providers) and Pulsar Finance (Portfolio Trackers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Pulsar Finance has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check RPC Fast's pricing and Pulsar Finance is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.