Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 4, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 9 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Salmon Salmon is an open-source, community-owned Solana wallet browser extension built with transparency and security in mind. It features transaction simulation to preview outcomes before signing, full SPL... RPC Fast RPC Fast provides dedicated Solana RPC endpoints optimized for low latency and high throughput. Built specifically for trading bots and applications that need fast transaction submission, it offers ba...
Both Salmon and RPC Fast hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Salmon uses a free model, while RPC Fast is paid. Salmon has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though RPC Fast's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Salmon offers 5 features including Transaction simulation, Open-source codebase, SPL token support, and 2 more. RPC Fast counters with 9 features including Low-latency dedicated RPC nodes, High-performance bare-metal infrastructure, Yellowstone gRPC, and 6 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Salmon currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RPC Fast is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Salmon's key strengths include fully open-source, transaction simulation prevents mistakes, community-governed. RPC Fast stands out for optimized for speed-sensitive applications, dedicated resources (not shared), good uptime track record. On the flip side, Salmon's weaknesses include smaller user base than phantom or backpack, while RPC Fast's main drawback is no free tier.
While Salmon (Wallets) and RPC Fast (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. We recommend trying both — Salmon is free to start and check RPC Fast's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.
More comparisons
Compare Salmon with…
Compare RPC Fast with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 7,330 | 439 |
| Categories | Wallets | RPC Providers |
| Description | Open-source community Solana wallet with transaction simulation | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. |