Beosin vs Hacken

Overview

Beosin Beosin is a Web3 security provider offering smart contract auditing, on-chain monitoring, and vulnerability scanning, with support for Solana programs. It spans both pre-deployment audits and post-dep... Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems....

Community Ratings

Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Beosin (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

Beosin uses a paid model, while Hacken is paid.

Key Features

Beosin offers 5 features including Smart contract auditing for Solana programs, On-chain monitoring and real-time threat alerts, Automated vulnerability scanning, and 2 more. Hacken counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Beosin currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hacken is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

Beosin's key strengths include covers the full security lifecycle, not just audits, combines manual review with automated analysis, real-time monitoring catches post-launch threats. Hacken stands out for broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. On the flip side, Beosin's weaknesses include b2b security service, not an end-user tool, while Hacken's main drawback is enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve).