Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 31, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Bitwave Bitwave is an enterprise crypto accounting, payments, and reporting platform that supports Solana alongside Ethereum, Bitcoin, and more. It's designed for businesses and institutions that need to brin... Conyr Conyr is a real-time wallet-intelligence platform for Solana that flags insiders, bundlers, and coordinated wallet crews in the same slot their trades land on-chain. It is aimed at traders who want to...
Bitwave is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Conyr (2 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Bitwave uses a paid model, while Conyr is freemium.
Bitwave offers 5 features including Crypto accounting, payments, and reporting in one platform, Multi-chain support including Solana, Ethereum, and Bitcoin, Handles DeFi protocols, yield-bearing tokens, and vaults, and 2 more. Conyr counters with 5 features including Real-time flagging of insiders, bundlers, and wallet crews, Same-slot detection as trades land on-chain, Own validator for sub-slot latency, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Bitwave currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Conyr is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Bitwave's key strengths include built for complex institutional crypto accounting, broad multi-chain coverage beyond solana, handles defi and yield-bearing token complexity. Conyr stands out for same-slot speed gives a timely read on wallet behavior, own validator enables sub-slot latency, helps distinguish organic from coordinated buying. On the flip side, Bitwave's weaknesses include oriented to enterprises, not individual users, while Conyr's main drawback is signals describe behavior, not guaranteed outcomes.
More comparisons
Compare Bitwave with…
Compare Conyr with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 2,281 | 1,361 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, Portfolio Trackers | Data & Indexing, Analytics & Charts |
| Description | Enterprise crypto accounting and tax reporting for Solana | Real-time Solana wallet intelligence — insiders, bundlers, crews, same-slot |
Both Bitwave and Conyr operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Bitwave has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Bitwave's pricing and Conyr is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.