Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (5) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Bloom Bloom is an AI-powered Solana trading bot that uses machine learning to assist traders with token analysis, trade execution, and portfolio management. It represents the newer generation of trading too... Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes...
Bloom is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.2/5 stars across 5 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Figment (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Bloom uses a freemium model, while Figment is paid.
Bloom offers 8 features including AI-powered token analysis with risk assessment and sentiment detection, Telegram-based trading with quick swap execution, Machine learning-assisted trade recommendations, and 5 more. Figment counters with 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Bloom currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Figment is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Bloom's key strengths include ai analytics provide additional insight layer beyond basic trading features, comprehensive token analysis combines on-chain, social, and technical data, growing ai capabilities may improve over time as model training advances. Figment stands out for top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. On the flip side, Bloom's weaknesses include 1% transaction fee is among the highest for solana trading bots, while Figment's main drawback is premium institutional pricing.
More comparisons
Compare Bloom with…
Compare Figment with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 24,712 | 27,272 |
| Categories | Trading Bots | Staking |
| Description | AI-powered Solana trading bot with smart execution | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions |
While Bloom (Trading Bots) and Figment (Staking) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Bloom has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Bloom is free to start and check Figment's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.