deBridge vs Hyperlane

Overview

deBridge deBridge is a cross-chain interoperability protocol that enables fast, capital-efficient transfers between Solana and other major blockchains. Unlike traditional bridge protocols that lock-and-mint wr... Hyperlane Hyperlane is a permissionless interoperability protocol for cross-chain messaging and token bridging, spanning 150+ blockchain networks including Solana, Ethereum, and Cosmos chains. It provides the c...

Community Ratings

deBridge is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Hyperlane (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

deBridge uses a free model — Free to use. Small bridge fee (typically 0-0.1%) plus destination chain gas. Referral program earns 25% of points., while Hyperlane is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.

Key Features

deBridge offers 8 features including Zero-TVL bridge architecture with no large locked token pools, DLN (Liquidity Network) for near-instant cross-chain settlement, Cross-chain limit orders for executing transfers at target rates, and 5 more. Hyperlane counters with 5 features including Cross-chain messaging across 150+ networks, Token bridging between Solana, Ethereum, and Cosmos chains, Permissionless deployment without governance approval, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. deBridge currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hyperlane is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

deBridge's key strengths include zero-tvl model dramatically reduces security risk compared to traditional bridges, fastest cross-chain settlement speeds in the industry, lower risk profile makes it attractive after major bridge exploits industry-wide.