ELLIPAL vs Hacken

Overview

ELLIPAL ELLIPAL makes air-gapped hardware cold wallets for self-custody, led by the Titan 2.0 touchscreen device, alongside a Titan Mini and an NFC X Card. Keys are generated and stored offline and never leav... Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems....

Community Ratings

Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for ELLIPAL (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

ELLIPAL uses a paid model, while Hacken is paid.

Key Features

ELLIPAL offers 5 features including Fully air-gapped, no USB/Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, QR-code transaction signing, CC EAL5+ secure element, and 2 more. Hacken counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. ELLIPAL currently has a healthy health status with 99.2% uptime over the last 30 days. Hacken is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

ELLIPAL's key strengths include true offline self-custody of keys, air-gap reduces remote attack surface, touchscreen device with broad asset support. Hacken stands out for broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. On the flip side, ELLIPAL's weaknesses include solana is one of 40+ chains, support is generic, while Hacken's main drawback is enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve).