Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Envio Envio is a blockchain data indexing platform that turns on-chain events into queryable APIs, with native support for Solana alongside EVM-compatible chains and Fuel. Its pitch is fast, multichain inde... Sandglass Sandglass is a yield tokenization protocol on Solana that splits yield-bearing assets into two separate instruments: principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT). By separating the principal from the f...
Sandglass is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Envio (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Envio uses a freemium model, while Sandglass is free. Sandglass has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Envio's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Envio offers 5 features including TypeScript event handlers with auto-generated GraphQL APIs, HyperSync high-throughput data retrieval layer, HyperRPC read-only JSON-RPC endpoint, and 2 more. Sandglass counters with 5 features including Splits yield-bearing assets into principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT), Fixed-rate yield locking via discounted principal tokens, Leveraged yield trading for amplified yield exposure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Envio currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sandglass is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Envio's key strengths include native solana plus broad evm and fuel chain support, fast historical backfill and low-latency live indexing, flexible self-host or managed-cloud deployment options. Sandglass stands out for brings pendle-style yield tokenization natively to solana, enables predictable fixed-rate returns through pt, supports both lst and lending yields as sources.
More comparisons
Compare Envio with…
Compare Sandglass with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 4,223 | 3,292 |
| Categories | API Platforms, Developer Tools, Data & Indexing | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Ultrafast blockchain data indexer for Solana and EVM chains | Yield tokenization protocol for Solana DeFi strategies |
While Envio (API Platforms) and Sandglass (DeFi & Yield) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Sandglass has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Envio is free to start and Sandglass is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.