Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 19, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... Grayscale Grayscale is the world's largest digital asset manager, with over $20B in assets under management, and offers regulated vehicles for gaining Solana exposure without holding SOL directly. Its Grayscale...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Grayscale (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Figment uses a paid model, while Grayscale is paid.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. Grayscale counters with 5 features including Grayscale Solana Trust (GSOL) for regulated SOL exposure, One of the approved Solana ETFs, launched October 2025, Accessible through traditional brokerage accounts, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Grayscale is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. Grayscale stands out for regulated path to sol exposure without managing wallets or keys, etf access through ordinary brokerage accounts, backed by a large, established asset manager. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while Grayscale's main drawback is price exposure only — no staking, defi, or on-chain utility.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare Grayscale with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,272 | 682,692 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Institutional-grade Solana investment products — SOL Trust and SOL ETF |
Both Figment and Grayscale operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and check Grayscale's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.