Head-to-head · DEXs & Swaps
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
FluxBeam FluxBeam is a Solana DEX that pioneered full support for the Token-2022 (Token Extensions) standard. While most DEXes initially couldn't handle the new token standard's features like transfer fees, in... Foxify Foxify is a P2P perpetual futures trading protocol on Solana where users can create custom trading pairs and take the other side of trades. Unlike traditional perp DEXs that use liquidity pools, Foxif...
Foxify is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for FluxBeam (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
FluxBeam uses a free model, while Foxify is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
FluxBeam offers 5 features including Full Token-2022 (Token Extensions) support, Infinity Pro Trading Terminal, Limit orders, take-profit, and stop-loss, and 2 more. Foxify counters with 6 features including P2P perpetual futures trading, Custom trading pair creation, Up to 200x leverage, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. FluxBeam currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Foxify is rated healthy with 98.1% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
FluxBeam's key strengths include first dex with complete token-2022 support, advanced trading terminal features, good liquidity via jupiter integration. Foxify stands out for unique p2p model for perps, custom pairs not available elsewhere, high leverage options. On the flip side, FluxBeam's weaknesses include smaller user base than major dexes, while Foxify's main drawback is p2p model requires counterparty.
More comparisons
Compare FluxBeam with…
Compare Foxify with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 37,405 | 18,630 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps | DEXs & Swaps, DeFi & Yield |
| Description | First Solana DEX with full Token-2022 support and advanced trading terminal | Peer-to-peer perpetual futures DEX on Solana with customizable trading pairs |
Both FluxBeam and Foxify operate in the dexs & swaps space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Foxify has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — FluxBeam is free to start and Foxify is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.