Head-to-head · Liquid Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 19, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Fragmetric Fragmetric is Solana's first and largest native liquid restaking protocol, launched in October 2024, with over $300 million in Total Value Locked and 80,000+ active participants. The protocol allows u... Phase Labs Phase Labs is a Solana staking infrastructure provider that issues phaseSOL, a liquid staking token representing SOL delegated through its validator setup. The hook is staking that stays liquid, so th...
Both Fragmetric and Phase Labs hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Fragmetric uses a free model — No platform fees. Standard network transaction fees apply., while Phase Labs is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Fragmetric offers 7 features including Liquid restaking with fragSOL and fragJTO tokens, Accepts SOL and multiple LSTs as deposits, Additional NCN rewards on top of staking yields, and 4 more. Phase Labs counters with 5 features including phaseSOL liquid staking token, Non-custodial SOL staking, Enterprise-grade validator infrastructure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Fragmetric currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Phase Labs is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Fragmetric's key strengths include largest liquid restaking protocol on solana, stacking yields: staking + ncn rewards, open-source with transparent on-chain mechanics. Phase Labs stands out for keeps staked sol liquid via phasesol, non-custodial; keys stay with the user, hardened validator and multisig security. On the flip side, Fragmetric's weaknesses include restaking carries additional smart contract risk, while Phase Labs's main drawback is smaller lst with less liquidity than jito or marinade.
More comparisons
Compare Fragmetric with…
Compare Phase Labs with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 48,816 | — |
| Categories | Liquid Staking | Liquid Staking |
| Description | Solana's leading liquid restaking protocol with $300M+ TVL | Solana liquid staking provider offering phaseSOL LST with enterprise-grade validator infrastructure |
Both Fragmetric and Phase Labs operate in the liquid staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Fragmetric is free to start and Phase Labs is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.