Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 12, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
HumidiFi HumidiFi is Solana's largest proprietary automated market maker (AMM), processing over $1 billion in daily trading volume and handling 35%+ of Solana's spot DEX activity. It sits at the core of Solana... RPC Fast RPC Fast is a low-latency Solana RPC and data-streaming provider built for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Its hook is delivering early on-chain signals and fast transaction routing f...
Both HumidiFi and RPC Fast hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
HumidiFi uses a free model, while RPC Fast is paid — https://rpcfast.com/pricing. HumidiFi has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though RPC Fast's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
HumidiFi offers 5 features including Proprietary AMM processing over $1B in daily volume, Handles 35%+ of Solana spot DEX activity, Private vault-based liquidity model, and 2 more. RPC Fast counters with 5 features including Low-latency Solana RPC access, gRPC streaming (Yellowstone, Shredstream, Aperture), Direct validator shred intake, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. HumidiFi currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RPC Fast is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
HumidiFi's key strengths include massive depth reduces slippage on large trades, over $1b daily volume signals strong liquidity, benefits traders indirectly via aggregator routing. RPC Fast stands out for built for latency-critical trading workloads, multiple streaming options for raw data, early signal access ahead of block confirmation. On the flip side, HumidiFi's weaknesses include private-vault model is less transparent than open pools, while RPC Fast's main drawback is specialized for advanced builders, not general devs.
More comparisons
Compare HumidiFi with…
Compare RPC Fast with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 449 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps | RPC Providers |
| Description | Solana's largest proprietary AMM powering over $1B in daily volume | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. |
While HumidiFi (DEXs & Swaps) and RPC Fast (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — HumidiFi is free to start and check RPC Fast's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.