Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
ICM Analytics ICM Analytics is a fundamentals-focused crypto analytics platform positioning itself as the intelligence layer for Internet Capital Markets. Instead of hype-based trading, it tracks fundamental and ad... Salmon Salmon is an open-source, community-owned Solana wallet delivered as a browser extension, built with an emphasis on transparency and security. Its standout feature is transaction simulation, which pre...
Both ICM Analytics and Salmon hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
ICM Analytics uses a freemium model, while Salmon is free. Salmon has the edge for budget-conscious users, though ICM Analytics's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
ICM Analytics offers 6 features including Fundamental token metrics: revenue, P/E-style ratios, DAU, app-store ratings, holder counts, Live dashboards with holder tracking, limit-order and DCA monitoring, AI Feed tracking calls from monitored AI agents, and 3 more. Salmon counters with 5 features including Open-source, community-owned Solana wallet browser extension, Transaction simulation to preview outcomes before signing, Full SPL token support, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. ICM Analytics currently has a healthy health status with 90.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Salmon is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
ICM Analytics's key strengths include fundamentals-and-adoption angle is differentiated from typical chart/price-only tools, aggregates on-chain, social, and web2 adoption data (app ratings, dau) in one place, free entry tier lowers the barrier to evaluate the data. Salmon stands out for open, auditable code lets users verify how keys are handled, transaction simulation helps catch malicious actions before signing, community-owned framing aligns incentives with users.
More comparisons
Compare ICM Analytics with…
Compare Salmon with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 191 | 7,314 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, AI Agents, Analytics & Charts | Wallets |
| Description | The fundamentals intelligence layer for Internet Capital Markets | Open-source community Solana wallet with transaction simulation |
While ICM Analytics (Data & Indexing) and Salmon (Wallets) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — ICM Analytics is free to start and Salmon is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.