Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
ICM Analytics ICM Analytics is a fundamentals-focused crypto analytics platform positioning itself as the intelligence layer for Internet Capital Markets. Instead of hype-based trading, it tracks fundamental and ad... Sandglass Sandglass is a yield tokenization protocol on Solana that splits yield-bearing assets into two separate instruments: principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT). By separating the principal from the f...
ICM Analytics is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Sandglass (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
ICM Analytics uses a freemium model, while Sandglass is free. Sandglass has the edge for budget-conscious users, though ICM Analytics's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
ICM Analytics offers 6 features including Fundamental token metrics: revenue, P/E-style ratios, DAU, app-store ratings, holder counts, Live dashboards with holder tracking, limit-order and DCA monitoring, AI Feed tracking calls from monitored AI agents, and 3 more. Sandglass counters with 5 features including Splits yield-bearing assets into principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT), Fixed-rate yield locking via discounted principal tokens, Leveraged yield trading for amplified yield exposure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. ICM Analytics currently has a healthy health status with 90.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sandglass is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
ICM Analytics's key strengths include fundamentals-and-adoption angle is differentiated from typical chart/price-only tools, aggregates on-chain, social, and web2 adoption data (app ratings, dau) in one place, free entry tier lowers the barrier to evaluate the data.
More comparisons
Compare ICM Analytics with…
Compare Sandglass with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 191 | 3,292 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, AI Agents, Analytics & Charts | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | The fundamentals intelligence layer for Internet Capital Markets | Yield tokenization protocol for Solana DeFi strategies |
While ICM Analytics (Data & Indexing) and Sandglass (DeFi & Yield) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. ICM Analytics has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — ICM Analytics is free to start and Sandglass is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.