Head-to-head · DEXs & Swaps
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 19, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Jupiter Terminal Jupiter Terminal is an open-source, embeddable swap component built by Jupiter, the leading swap aggregator on Solana. It lets developers drop full token-swap functionality into any webpage or dApp, s... Foxify Foxify is a P2P perpetual futures trading protocol on Solana where users can create custom trading pairs and take the other side of trades. Unlike traditional perp DEXs that use liquidity pools, Foxif...
Both Jupiter Terminal and Foxify hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Jupiter Terminal uses a free model, while Foxify is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Jupiter Terminal offers 5 features including Open-source embeddable swap widget powered by Jupiter, Drops full token-swap functionality into any webpage or dApp, Automatic slippage management, retries, and transaction handling, and 2 more. Foxify counters with 6 features including P2P perpetual futures trading, Custom trading pair creation, Up to 200x leverage, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Jupiter Terminal currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Foxify is rated healthy with 98.1% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Jupiter Terminal's key strengths include adds production-grade swaps with minimal integration effort, open-source and powered by jupiter's aggregation, handles slippage, retries, and wallet connection out of the box. Foxify stands out for unique p2p model for perps, custom pairs not available elsewhere, high leverage options. On the flip side, Jupiter Terminal's weaknesses include routing and pricing depend on jupiter's infrastructure, while Foxify's main drawback is p2p model requires counterparty.
More comparisons
Compare Jupiter Terminal with…
Compare Foxify with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 618,646 | 18,602 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps, Developer Tools | DEXs & Swaps, DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Embeddable swap widget powered by Jupiter for any Solana dApp | Peer-to-peer perpetual futures DEX on Solana with customizable trading pairs |
Both Jupiter Terminal and Foxify operate in the dexs & swaps space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Jupiter Terminal is free to start and Foxify is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.