Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 19, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Ligma Node Ligma Node provides private, high-performance Solana RPC nodes aimed at traders and automation that need low-latency network access. It markets dedicated bare-metal infrastructure rather than shared p... RPC Fast RPC Fast is a low-latency Solana RPC and data-streaming provider built for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Its hook is delivering early on-chain signals and fast transaction routing f...
RPC Fast is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Ligma Node (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Ligma Node uses a paid model, while RPC Fast is paid — https://rpcfast.com/pricing.
Ligma Node offers 5 features including Dedicated bare-metal Solana RPC nodes, Multi-region (USA, EU, Asia) deployment, Geyser streaming support, and 2 more. RPC Fast counters with 5 features including Low-latency Solana RPC access, gRPC streaming (Yellowstone, Shredstream, Aperture), Direct validator shred intake, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Ligma Node currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RPC Fast is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Ligma Node's key strengths include dedicated infrastructure, not shared endpoints, regional selection for lower latency, unlimited bandwidth and requests. RPC Fast stands out for built for latency-critical trading workloads, multiple streaming options for raw data, early signal access ahead of block confirmation. On the flip side, Ligma Node's weaknesses include advertised tps figures are vendor estimates, while RPC Fast's main drawback is specialized for advanced builders, not general devs.
More comparisons
Compare Ligma Node with…
Compare RPC Fast with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | 4,896 | 453 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | High-performance Solana RPC nodes with up to 6,500 TPS on dedicated bare-metal servers | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. |
Both Ligma Node and RPC Fast operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. RPC Fast has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Ligma Node's pricing and check RPC Fast's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.