Head-to-head · Comparison
Mayan Finance vs Envio
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 29, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
The trade-offs.
Mayan Finance
- Fastest cross-chain swaps available — most complete in under 60 seconds
- Single-transaction UX eliminates the multi-step bridge-then-swap workflow
- Competitive pricing through auction mechanism — relayers compete to give best rates
- Backed by Wormhole's robust security infrastructure with institutional validators
- Integrated into Jupiter meaning Solana users automatically benefit from Mayan's routing
- Depends on Wormhole infrastructure — any Wormhole downtime affects Mayan
- Cross-chain swaps have higher fees than single-chain swaps due to bridging costs
- Some exotic token pairs may have limited liquidity or longer settlement times
- Relay auction can occasionally result in slower fills during low relayer activity
Analysis
Which should you choose?
.
Overview
Mayan Finance Mayan Finance is a cross-chain swap protocol that enables users to bridge and swap assets between Solana and other major blockchains in a single transaction. Built on top of Wormhole's messaging infra... Envio Envio is a blockchain data indexing platform that turns on-chain events into queryable APIs, with native support for Solana alongside EVM-compatible chains and Fuel. Its pitch is fast, multichain inde...
Community Ratings
Both Mayan Finance and Envio hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Pricing & Value
Mayan Finance uses a free model — No platform fee. Users pay a small relayer fee embedded in the swap quote. Mayan earns from the spread in the relayer auction. All fees shown upfront., while Envio is freemium. Mayan Finance has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Envio's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Key Features
Mayan Finance offers 8 features including Cross-chain swaps between Solana and 15+ blockchains in a single transaction, Auction-based relay system ensuring competitive pricing for cross-chain transfers, Sub-60-second completion times for most cross-chain swaps, and 5 more. Envio counters with 5 features including TypeScript event handlers with auto-generated GraphQL APIs, HyperSync high-throughput data retrieval layer, HyperRPC read-only JSON-RPC endpoint, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Mayan Finance currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Envio is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Mayan Finance's key strengths include fastest cross-chain swaps available — most complete in under 60 seconds, single-transaction ux eliminates the multi-step bridge-then-swap workflow, competitive pricing through auction mechanism — relayers compete to give best rates.
More comparisons
Compare with another tool.
Compare Mayan Finance with…
Compare Envio with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
More side-by-side breakdowns.
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.