Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 16, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Mayan Finance Mayan Finance is a cross-chain swap protocol that enables users to bridge and swap assets between Solana and other major blockchains in a single transaction. Built on top of Wormhole's messaging infra... Sphere Sphere is a next-generation crypto payments infrastructure platform built on Solana, providing APIs and tools for businesses to accept and process cryptocurrency payments at scale. It targets enterpri...
Sphere is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Mayan Finance (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Mayan Finance uses a free model — No platform fee. Users pay a small relayer fee embedded in the swap quote. Mayan earns from the spread in the relayer auction. All fees shown upfront., while Sphere is freemium — Free to start. Transaction-based pricing. Enterprise plans available.. Mayan Finance has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Sphere's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Mayan Finance offers 8 features including Cross-chain swaps between Solana and 15+ blockchains in a single transaction, Auction-based relay system ensuring competitive pricing for cross-chain transfers, Sub-60-second completion times for most cross-chain swaps, and 5 more. Sphere counters with 8 features including Comprehensive REST APIs for programmatic payment processing, Hosted checkout pages for no-code payment acceptance, Subscription and recurring billing management, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Mayan Finance currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sphere is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare Mayan Finance with…
Compare Sphere with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 36,609 | 27,416 |
| Categories | Bridges | Payment Tools |
| Description | Cross-chain swap protocol — bridge assets between Solana, Ethereum, and 10+ chains instantly via Wormhole | Next-generation payments infrastructure for the internet |
Mayan Finance's key strengths include fastest cross-chain swaps available — most complete in under 60 seconds, single-transaction ux eliminates the multi-step bridge-then-swap workflow, competitive pricing through auction mechanism — relayers compete to give best rates. Sphere stands out for developer-first api design enables deep integration into any application, compliance features make it suitable for regulated business use cases, automatic stablecoin conversion protects merchants from crypto volatility. On the flip side, Mayan Finance's weaknesses include depends on wormhole infrastructure — any wormhole downtime affects mayan, while Sphere's main drawback is more complex setup compared to simpler payment link tools like helio.
While Mayan Finance (Bridges) and Sphere (Payment Tools) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Sphere has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Mayan Finance is free to start and Sphere is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.