Head-to-head · Wallets
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
MetaKeep MetaKeep provides enterprise blockchain infrastructure with an invisible wallet API that can be production-ready in five minutes. Built by teams from Diem, WhatsApp Pay, Google, and Microsoft, MetaKee... Openfort Openfort provides embedded wallet infrastructure for building web3 games and applications on Solana. Instead of forcing players and users to install a separate wallet extension, developers can embed w...
Openfort is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for MetaKeep (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
MetaKeep uses a freemium model, while Openfort is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
MetaKeep offers 6 features including Invisible wallet API — no seed phrases or popups, HSM-backed military-grade hardware security, Production-ready in 5 minutes with simple API, and 3 more. Openfort counters with 5 features including Embedded wallet creation via a simple API, Transaction signing and session management, Gas sponsorship for gasless user experiences, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. MetaKeep currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Openfort is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
MetaKeep's key strengths include enterprise-grade security without user friction, fastest time-to-production among wallet apis, multi-chain support through a single api. Openfort stands out for removes wallet-install friction for end users, gasless flows improve onboarding and retention, account abstraction enables flexible security policies.
More comparisons
Compare MetaKeep with…
Compare Openfort with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 212 | — |
| Categories | Wallets, Developer Tools | Wallets, Gaming |
| Description | Enterprise-grade invisible wallet API with hardware security for Solana and EVM | Embedded smart wallet infrastructure for games and apps on Solana |
Both MetaKeep and Openfort operate in the wallets space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Openfort has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — MetaKeep is free to start and Openfort is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.