Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Neodyme Neodyme is a specialized security research firm with deep Solana expertise, working with the Solana Foundation since 2020 on core protocol security reviews. Their team has discovered and responsibly d... Zellic Zellic is a premier blockchain security firm specializing in smart contract audits for Solana and other chains. Founded by veteran security researchers, Zellic has audited some of the most critical pr...
Zellic is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Neodyme (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Neodyme uses a paid model, while Zellic is paid.
Neodyme offers 4 features including Deep-dive Solana smart contract audits since 2020, Vulnerability research across Solana runtime and programs, Open-source Solana Security Workshop, and 1 more. Zellic counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits for Solana/Rust, Formal verification and symbolic analysis, Vulnerability research and responsible disclosure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Neodyme currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Zellic is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Neodyme's key strengths include one of the earliest solana security teams with unmatched depth, track record preventing ~$1b in potential theft. Zellic stands out for audited top-tier protocols (wormhole, pyth, layerzero), deep solana/rust expertise, thorough manual review process. On the flip side, Neodyme's weaknesses include small boutique team with limited availability, while Zellic's main drawback is premium pricing for audit engagements.
More comparisons
Compare Neodyme with…
Compare Zellic with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 5,641 | 17,904 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Elite Solana security research and smart contract auditing since 2020 | Elite smart contract security audits trusted by top Solana protocols |
Both Neodyme and Zellic operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Zellic has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Neodyme's pricing and check Zellic's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.