Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 16, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
OtterSec OtterSec is one of the most respected security auditing firms in the Solana ecosystem, having audited critical infrastructure including Wormhole, Solana Program Library, Marinade, and dozens of top De... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for OtterSec (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
OtterSec uses a paid model, while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Sanctum has the edge for budget-conscious users, though OtterSec's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
OtterSec offers 5 features including Comprehensive Solana smart contract and program audits, Deep expertise in Rust, Anchor, and native Solana programs, Post-audit monitoring and incident response support, and 2 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. OtterSec currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
OtterSec's key strengths include gold-standard reputation — audit by ottersec signals serious security commitment, deepest solana-specific expertise of any audit firm, track record includes the most critical solana infrastructure.
More comparisons
Compare OtterSec with…
Compare Sanctum with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 21,039 | 81,124 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Premier Solana smart contract security auditor trusted by top protocols | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity |
While OtterSec (Security & Audit) and Sanctum (DeFi & Yield) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check OtterSec's pricing and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.