Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 7, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (5) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Phantom Phantom is the most widely used wallet in the Solana ecosystem and has become synonymous with Solana itself. With millions of active users, Phantom provides a seamless gateway to DeFi, NFTs, token swa... Kima Network Kima Network is a universal settlement layer built to enable seamless transfers across public blockchains, private blockchains, and even traditional bank accounts. A distinguishing design choice is th...
Phantom is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.6/5 stars across 5 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Kima Network (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Phantom uses a free model — Free to use. Built-in swap charges approximately 0.85% fee. Staking is free with standard validator commission., while Kima Network is freemium. Phantom has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Kima Network's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Phantom offers 8 features including Browser extension and mobile app with full feature parity, Built-in token swap aggregator powered by Jupiter for best prices, Native SOL staking with validator selection and rewards tracking, and 5 more. Kima Network counters with 5 features including Universal settlement layer across public and private blockchains, Transfers that connect to traditional bank accounts, Operates without relying on smart contracts, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Phantom currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Kima Network is rated healthy with 92.5% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Phantom's key strengths include most widely supported wallet — works with virtually every solana dapp, intuitive design that makes blockchain interactions accessible to beginners, strong security with transaction simulation and phishing protection.
More comparisons
Compare Phantom with…
Compare Kima Network with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 4 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 947,428 | 430,961 |
| Categories | Wallets | Payment Tools, Bridges |
| Description | Most-used Solana wallet — send, swap, stake SOL, and manage NFTs with built-in DEX aggregation and hardware wallet support | Cross-ecosystem money transfer protocol — connect blockchains and bank accounts |
While Phantom (Wallets) and Kima Network (Payment Tools) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Phantom has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Phantom is free to start and Kima Network is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.