Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
PumpSwap MCP PumpSwap MCP is a Model Context Protocol server that lets AI assistants trade on PumpSwap, pump.fun's DEX for graduated tokens. It gives agents execution access, not just data. Through it, an agent c... Salmon Salmon is an open-source, community-owned Solana wallet delivered as a browser extension, built with an emphasis on transparency and security. Its standout feature is transaction simulation, which pre...
Both PumpSwap MCP and Salmon hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
PumpSwap MCP uses a free model, while Salmon is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
PumpSwap MCP offers 5 features including MCP server for trading on PumpSwap, Buy/sell with customizable slippage and priority fees, Token price lookups, and 2 more. Salmon counters with 5 features including Open-source, community-owned Solana wallet browser extension, Transaction simulation to preview outcomes before signing, Full SPL token support, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. PumpSwap MCP currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Salmon is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
PumpSwap MCP's key strengths include gives ai agents direct pumpswap execution, configurable slippage and priority fees, open source and self-hostable. Salmon stands out for open, auditable code lets users verify how keys are handled, transaction simulation helps catch malicious actions before signing, community-owned framing aligns incentives with users. On the flip side, PumpSwap MCP's weaknesses include execution authority means trusting the agent with funds, while Salmon's main drawback is community-driven projects may ship features slower than funded rivals.
More comparisons
Compare PumpSwap MCP with…
Compare Salmon with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 7,314 |
| Categories | MCP Servers | Wallets |
| Description | Buy and sell tokens on PumpSwap with customizable slippage and priority fees via AI agents | Open-source community Solana wallet with transaction simulation |
While PumpSwap MCP (MCP Servers) and Salmon (Wallets) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — PumpSwap MCP is free to start and Salmon is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.