Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
RockawayX RockawayX is a blockchain infrastructure operator and investment firm that has run validators and bare-metal nodes since 2020, positioning itself among the earliest dedicated Solana infrastructure pro... RPC Fast RPC Fast is a low-latency Solana RPC and data-streaming provider built for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Its hook is delivering early on-chain signals and fast transaction routing f...
RPC Fast is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for RockawayX (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
RockawayX uses a paid model, while RPC Fast is paid — https://rpcfast.com/pricing.
RockawayX offers 5 features including Bare-metal dedicated RPC nodes, Self-operated data centers and custom hardware, Proof-of-stake validators across 50+ networks, and 2 more. RPC Fast counters with 5 features including Low-latency Solana RPC access, gRPC streaming (Yellowstone, Shredstream, Aperture), Direct validator shred intake, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RockawayX currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. RPC Fast is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
RockawayX's key strengths include long-standing operator with deep solana infrastructure experience, owned hardware and data centers rather than reseller cloud, dedicated configurations and direct engineering contact. RPC Fast stands out for built for latency-critical trading workloads, multiple streaming options for raw data, early signal access ahead of block confirmation. On the flip side, RockawayX's weaknesses include enterprise-focused with bespoke, non-transparent pricing, while RPC Fast's main drawback is specialized for advanced builders, not general devs.
More comparisons
Compare RockawayX with…
Compare RPC Fast with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | 11,267 | 454 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | OG Solana infrastructure with enterprise bare-metal RPC nodes | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. |
Both RockawayX and RPC Fast operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. RPC Fast has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check RockawayX's pricing and check RPC Fast's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.