RPC Fast vs Envio

Overview

RPC Fast RPC Fast is a low-latency Solana RPC and data-streaming provider built for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Its hook is delivering early on-chain signals and fast transaction routing f... Envio Envio is a blockchain data indexing platform that turns on-chain events into queryable APIs, with native support for Solana alongside EVM-compatible chains and Fuel. Its pitch is fast, multichain inde...

Community Ratings

RPC Fast is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Envio (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

RPC Fast uses a paid model — https://rpcfast.com/pricing, while Envio is freemium.

Key Features

RPC Fast offers 5 features including Low-latency Solana RPC access, gRPC streaming (Yellowstone, Shredstream, Aperture), Direct validator shred intake, and 2 more. Envio counters with 5 features including TypeScript event handlers with auto-generated GraphQL APIs, HyperSync high-throughput data retrieval layer, HyperRPC read-only JSON-RPC endpoint, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RPC Fast currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Envio is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

RPC Fast's key strengths include built for latency-critical trading workloads, multiple streaming options for raw data, early signal access ahead of block confirmation. Envio stands out for native solana plus broad evm and fuel chain support, fast historical backfill and low-latency live indexing, flexible self-host or managed-cloud deployment options. On the flip side, RPC Fast's weaknesses include specialized for advanced builders, not general devs, while Envio's main drawback is multi-chain focus means solana support is less mature than evm.